↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
Title
Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003007.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teddy Oosterhuis, Leonardo OP Costa, Christopher G Maher, Henrica CW de Vet, Maurits W van Tulder, Raymond WJG Ostelo

Abstract

Several rehabilitation programmes are available for individuals after lumbar disc surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 334 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 10%
Researcher 30 9%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 69 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 17%
Psychology 14 4%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 85 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#972,749
of 17,619,075 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,538
of 11,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,361
of 231,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,619,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.