↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
Title
Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003007.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teddy Oosterhuis, Leonardo OP Costa, Christopher G Maher, Henrica CW de Vet, Maurits W van Tulder, Raymond WJG Ostelo

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 497 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 15%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 8%
Researcher 32 6%
Other 97 19%
Unknown 164 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 76 15%
Psychology 20 4%
Sports and Recreations 19 4%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Other 59 12%
Unknown 176 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,619,260
of 26,399,279 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,273
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,423
of 236,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,399,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.