↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002010.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise S Conwell, Anne B Chang

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a bone mineralisation disorder occurring in about one third of adults with cystic fibrosis. Bisphosphonates can increase bone mineral density and decrease the risk of new fractures in post-menopausal women and people receiving long-term oral corticosteroids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 17%
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Researcher 19 8%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 58 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 68 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,687,862
of 21,365,584 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,886
of 12,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,294
of 204,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,365,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.