| Title |
Testosterone for peri and postmenopausal women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004509.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Woraluk Somboonporn, Robin J Bell, Susan R Davis |
| Abstract |
: The value of adding testosterone to hormone therapy (HT) for the management of peri- and postmenopausal women is controversial and has not been systematically reviewed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Djibouti | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 16% |
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 19% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Psychology | 16 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,189,752
of 24,147,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,970
of 12,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,918
of 60,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,147,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.