↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Testosterone for peri and postmenopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Testosterone for peri and postmenopausal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004509.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Woraluk Somboonporn, Robin J Bell, Susan R Davis

Abstract

: The value of adding testosterone to hormone therapy (HT) for the management of peri- and postmenopausal women is controversial and has not been systematically reviewed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Psychology 14 7%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 41 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,112,609
of 14,453,232 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,807
of 10,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,287
of 191,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,453,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.