↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002296
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alaa Rostom, Catherine Dube, George A Wells, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Emilie Jolicoeur, Jessie McGowan, Angel Lanas, Eleanor Rushton, Tushar Shukla

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 167 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 39 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,257,747
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,933
of 12,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,470
of 48,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.