↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010844.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh M Kew, Sofia Dias, Christopher J Cates

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 254 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 59 22%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 6%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Psychology 13 5%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 61 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#729,948
of 18,780,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,752
of 11,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,746
of 200,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,780,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.