↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010844.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh M Kew, Sofia Dias, Christopher J Cates

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 274 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 18%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Other 20 7%
Other 61 22%
Unknown 63 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 6%
Psychology 16 6%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 71 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,224,239
of 22,193,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,865
of 12,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,886
of 206,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,193,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.