↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
Title
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008486.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue Woodward, Christine Norton, Pauline Chiarelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 408 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 18%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Researcher 40 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 31 8%
Other 73 18%
Unknown 114 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 13%
Psychology 22 5%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Sports and Recreations 9 2%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 129 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,675,207
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,127
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,210
of 239,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.