↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Direct thrombin inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in people with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Direct thrombin inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in people with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009893.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos A Salazar, Daniel del Aguila, Erika G Cordova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 21%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Researcher 25 8%
Other 24 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 80 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 89 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,401,150
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,678
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,117
of 238,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.