↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical interventions for fungal keratitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Medical interventions for fungal keratitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004241.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilo Vincent FlorCruz, Jennifer R Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 59 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 65 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,060,334
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,232
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,725
of 281,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#188
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.