↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing measles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing measles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010056.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan K Young, Graeme R Nimmo, Allan W Cripps, Mark A Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 23%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Psychology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 37 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,015,014
of 17,658,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,639
of 11,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,762
of 199,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,658,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.