↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing measles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing measles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010056.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan K Young, Graeme R Nimmo, Allan W Cripps, Mark A Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Psychology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 49 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,131,513
of 21,192,559 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,710
of 12,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,599
of 207,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,192,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.