| Title |
Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing measles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010056.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan K Young, Graeme R Nimmo, Allan W Cripps, Mark A Jones |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 26 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 60 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,561,270
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,488
of 12,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,786
of 230,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.