| Title |
Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005620.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Graciela Rasines Alcaraz, Analia Veitz-Keenan, Philipp Sahrmann, Patrick Roger Schmidlin, Dell Davis, Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 22% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 11% |
| Chile | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 452 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 8% |
| Researcher | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 18% |
| Unknown | 131 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 233 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 149 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#605,014
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,191
of 12,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,902
of 227,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.