↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
Title
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing otitis media
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001480.pub4
Pubmed ID
24696098
Authors

Alexandre C Fortanier, Roderick P Venekamp, Chantal WB Boonacker, Eelko Hak, Anne GM Schilder, Elisabeth AM Sanders, Roger AMJ Damoiseaux

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 34 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,057,505
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,730
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,149
of 225,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.