| Title |
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing otitis media
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001480.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandre C Fortanier, Roderick P Venekamp, Chantal WB Boonacker, Eelko Hak, Anne GM Schilder, Elisabeth AM Sanders, Roger AMJ Damoiseaux |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Hungary | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,057,505
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,730
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,149
of 225,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.