↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
Title
Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003881.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivienne Kirchin, Tobias Page, Phil E Keegan, Kofi OM Atiemo, June D Cody, Samuel McClinton, Patricia Aluko

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 356 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 11%
Student > Master 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Other 24 7%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 132 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Psychology 13 4%
Engineering 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 139 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,641,651
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,367
of 13,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,075
of 331,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.