| Title |
Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003881.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivienne Kirchin, Tobias Page, Phil E Keegan, Kofi OM Atiemo, June D Cody, Samuel McClinton, Patricia Aluko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 350 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 16% |
| Unknown | 124 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 130 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,633,507
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,461
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,209
of 330,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.