↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block versus parenteral analgesia for postoperative pain relief after major shoulder surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block versus parenteral analgesia for postoperative pain relief after major shoulder surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007080.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hameed Ullah, Khalid Samad, Fauzia A Khan

Abstract

Postoperative pain may lead to adverse effects on the body, which might result in an increase in morbidity. Its management therefore poses a unique challenge for the clinician. Major shoulder surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain, and different modalities are available to manage such pain, including opioid and non-opioid analgesics, local anaesthetics infiltrated into and around the shoulder joint and regional anaesthesia. All of these techniques, alone or in combination, have been used to treat the postoperative pain of major shoulder surgery but with varying success.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Other 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 39 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,547,784
of 21,362,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,217
of 12,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,890
of 207,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,362,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.