↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002140.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noelle O'Rourke, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Nuria Farré Bernadó, Fergus Macbeth

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 4, 2004. The use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might be seen as a way of increasing the effectiveness of radical radiotherapy at the same time as reducing the risks of metastatic disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 240 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 16%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Other 29 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 61 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,694,647
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,269
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,350
of 83,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.