↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002140.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noelle O'Rourke, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Nuria Farré Bernadó, Fergus Macbeth

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 4, 2004. The use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might be seen as a way of increasing the effectiveness of radical radiotherapy at the same time as reducing the risks of metastatic disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 216 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Master 32 14%
Other 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 9%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 49 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,521,404
of 15,856,856 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,184
of 11,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,812
of 193,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,856,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.