↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004923.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Rada, Daniel Capurro, Tomas Pantoja, Javiera Corbalán, Gladys Moreno, Luz M Letelier, Claudio Vera

Abstract

Hot flushes are common in women with a history of breast cancer. Hormonal therapies are known to reduce these symptoms but are not recommended in women with a history of breast cancer due to their potential adverse effects. The efficacy of non-hormonal therapies is still uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 18%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 35 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,162,912
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,025
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,926
of 97,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.