Report for: Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer

Title	Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd004923.pub2
Pubmed ID	20824841
Authors	Gabriel Rada, Daniel Capurro, Tomas Pantoja, Javiera Corbalán, Gladys Moreno, Luz M Letelier, Claudio Vera
Abstract	Hot flushes are common in women with a history of breast cancer. Hormonal therapies are known to reduce these symptoms but are not recommended in women with a history of breast cancer due to their potential adverse effects. The efficacy of non-hormonal therapies is still uncertain.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Spain	12	48%
United Kingdom	6	24%
Saudi Arabia	1	4%
Argentina	1	4%
Unknown	5	20%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	21	84%
Scientists	2	8%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	2	8%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Spain	1	<1%
Chile	1	<1%
Unknown	220	99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	38	17%
Student > Bachelor	37	17%
Researcher	22	10%
Student > Ph. D. Student	19	9%
Student > Doctoral Student	14	6%
Other	34	15%
Unknown	58	26%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	73	33%
Nursing and Health Professions	29	13%
Social Sciences	10	5%
Psychology	9	4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	7	3%
Other	30	14%
Unknown	64	29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.

All research outputs

#1,550,267

of 23,845,863 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#3,530

of 12,763 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#5,276

of 97,453 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#16

of 81 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,845,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context