↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Non‐hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004923.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Rada, Daniel Capurro, Tomas Pantoja, Javiera Corbalán, Gladys Moreno, Luz M Letelier, Claudio Vera

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 253 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 16%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 81 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 12%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 87 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,705,592
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,619
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,763
of 105,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.