↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus late chest radiotherapy in patients with limited‐stage small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Early versus late chest radiotherapy in patients with limited‐stage small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004700.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madelon Pijls‐Johannesma, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin, Ruud Houben, Isabelle Rutten, Johan F. Vansteenkiste

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Other 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,247,396
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,514
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,051
of 75,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.