↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
Title
General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008567.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graeme Tosh, Andrew V Clifton, Jun Xia, Margueritte M White

Abstract

There is currently much focus on provision of general physical health advice to people with serious mental illness and there has been increasing pressure for services to take responsibility for providing this.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 415 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 15%
Researcher 47 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Student > Postgraduate 30 7%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 116 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 13%
Psychology 42 10%
Social Sciences 29 7%
Unspecified 11 3%
Other 41 10%
Unknown 122 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,772,802
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,501
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,088
of 234,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.