↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008567.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graeme Tosh, Andrew V Clifton, Jun Xia, Margueritte M White

Abstract

There is currently much focus on provision of general physical health advice to people with serious mental illness and there has been increasing pressure for services to take responsibility for providing this.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 325 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 16%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Postgraduate 29 9%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 71 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 12%
Psychology 37 11%
Social Sciences 30 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 78 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,945,655
of 18,771,444 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,513
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,108
of 201,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,771,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.