The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008567.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graeme Tosh, Andrew V Clifton, Jun Xia, Margueritte M White |
| Abstract |
There is currently much focus on provision of general physical health advice to people with serious mental illness and there has been increasing pressure for services to take responsibility for providing this. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 424 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 15% |
| Researcher | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 16% |
| Unknown | 126 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 13% |
| Psychology | 42 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 39 | 9% |
| Unknown | 134 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,161,065
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,728
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,717
of 239,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.