↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Topical and systemic antifungal therapy for the symptomatic treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Topical and systemic antifungal therapy for the symptomatic treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008263.pub2
Pubmed ID
21833965
Authors

Peta-Lee Sacks, Richard J Harvey, Janet Rimmer, Richard M Gallagher, Raymond Sacks

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disorder of the nose and sinuses. Since fungi were postulated as a potential cause of CRS in the late 1990s, there has been increasing controversy about the use of both topical and systemic antifungal agents in its management. Although interaction between the immune system and fungus has been demonstrated in CRS, this does not necessarily imply that fungi are the cause of CRS or that antifungals will be effective its management.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,687,628
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,945
of 12,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,672
of 122,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.