The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Types of intraocular lenses for cataract surgery in eyes with uveitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007284.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Theresa G Leung, Kristina Lindsley, Irene C Kuo |
Abstract |
Cataract formation often occurs in people with uveitis. It is unclear which intraocular lens (IOL) type is optimal for use in cataract surgery for eyes with uveitis. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 190 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 18% |
Unknown | 59 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Engineering | 7 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 14% |
Unknown | 65 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,669,622
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,997
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,032
of 236,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.