↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
213 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
890 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000227.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Avenell, Jenson CS Mak, Dianne L O'Connell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 213 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 890 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 878 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 141 16%
Student > Bachelor 132 15%
Researcher 82 9%
Student > Postgraduate 71 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 7%
Other 221 25%
Unknown 177 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 342 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 113 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 38 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 4%
Social Sciences 28 3%
Other 132 15%
Unknown 200 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 337. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#81,136
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#680
of 227,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.