↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Summary Blogs Twitter Research highlights Dimensions citations
Title
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007554.pub2
Pubmed ID
24671928
Authors

Yeoungjee Cho, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sunil V Badve, Kathryn J Wiggins

Abstract

The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 22 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,933,648
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,727
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,888
of 226,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.