↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007554.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeoungjee Cho, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sunil V Badve, Kathryn J Wiggins

Abstract

The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 126 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,331,128
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,943
of 11,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,277
of 238,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.