↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007554.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeoungjee Cho, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sunil V Badve, Kathryn J Wiggins

Abstract

The longevity of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited by high rates of technique failure, some of which stem from peritoneal membrane injury. 'Biocompatible' PD solutions have been developed to reduce damage to the peritoneal membrane.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 60%
Psychology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 15 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,262,068
of 18,457,061 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,948
of 11,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,463
of 200,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,457,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.