↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid diagnostic tests versus clinical diagnosis for managing people with fever in malaria endemic settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests versus clinical diagnosis for managing people with fever in malaria endemic settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008998.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Odaga, David Sinclair, Joseph A Lokong, Sarah Donegan, Heidi Hopkins, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 288 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 22%
Researcher 43 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Postgraduate 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Other 67 22%
Unknown 37 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 49 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#853,418
of 18,446,132 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,118
of 11,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,373
of 200,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,446,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.