↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manipulative interventions for reducing pulled elbow in young children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
48 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Manipulative interventions for reducing pulled elbow in young children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007759.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjolein Krul, Johannes C van der Wouden, Emma J Kruithof, Lisette WA van Suijlekom‐Smit, Bart W Koes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 64 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 75 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#845,427
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,636
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,317
of 326,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.