Title |
Manipulative interventions for reducing pulled elbow in young children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007759.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marjolein Krul, Johannes C van der Wouden, Emma J Kruithof, Lisette WA van Suijlekom‐Smit, Bart W Koes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 12 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
United States | 3 | 6% |
Mexico | 2 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 25% |
Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
Researcher | 13 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 36 | 20% |
Unknown | 61 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
Psychology | 9 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Unknown | 72 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#845,427
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,636
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,317
of 326,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.