↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005387.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sven M Schulzke, Siree Kaempfen, Daniel Trachsel, Sanjay K Patole

Abstract

Lack of physical stimulation may contribute to metabolic bone disease of preterm infants, resulting in poor bone mineralization and growth. Physical activity programs combined with adequate nutrition might help to promote bone mineralization and growth.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 251 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 54 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 14%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Psychology 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 64 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2015.
All research outputs
#5,456,110
of 17,180,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,018
of 11,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,150
of 196,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,180,236 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.