↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
Title
Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005387.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sven M Schulzke, Siree Kaempfen, Daniel Trachsel, Sanjay K Patole

Abstract

Lack of physical stimulation may contribute to metabolic bone disease of preterm infants, resulting in poor bone mineralization and growth. Physical activity programs combined with adequate nutrition might help to promote bone mineralization and growth.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 291 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 81 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 13%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Psychology 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 91 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2015.
All research outputs
#5,763,806
of 21,360,407 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,747
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,880
of 205,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,360,407 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.