↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
Title
Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005387.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sven M Schulzke, Siree Kaempfen, Daniel Trachsel, Sanjay K Patole

Abstract

Lack of physical stimulation may contribute to metabolic bone disease of preterm infants, resulting in poor bone mineralization and growth. Physical activity programs combined with adequate nutrition might help to promote bone mineralization and growth.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 353 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 11%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 62 17%
Unknown 123 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 12%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Psychology 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 134 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,471,554
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,534
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,540
of 242,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.