| Title |
Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005387.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sven M Schulzke, Siree Kaempfen, Daniel Trachsel, Sanjay K Patole |
| Abstract |
Lack of physical stimulation may contribute to metabolic bone disease of preterm infants, resulting in poor bone mineralization and growth. Physical activity programs combined with adequate nutrition might help to promote bone mineralization and growth. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 342 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 18% |
| Unknown | 113 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 125 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,032,385
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,467
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,128
of 242,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#187
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.