↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006274.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip Good, Russell Richard, William Syrmis, Sue Jenkins-Marsh, Jane Stephens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 20%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 31 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#947,803
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,487
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,972
of 196,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.