↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous immunoglobulins for multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulins for multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Orla Gray, Gavin V McDonnell, Raeburn B Forbes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 27 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 32 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,632
of 53,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.