↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous immunoglobulins for multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulins for multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Orla Gray, Gavin V McDonnell, Raeburn B Forbes

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 39%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,609,698
of 17,365,229 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,106
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,346
of 277,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#199
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,365,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.