The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007768.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca E Ryan, Nancy Santesso, Dianne Lowe, Sophie Hill, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Megan Prictor, Caroline Kaufman, Genevieve Cowie, Michael Taylor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Belgium | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 21% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,016 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 997 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 178 | 18% |
| Researcher | 137 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 6% |
| Other | 204 | 20% |
| Unknown | 236 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 292 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 128 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 80 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 60 | 6% |
| Psychology | 51 | 5% |
| Other | 133 | 13% |
| Unknown | 272 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#833,120
of 26,329,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,469
of 13,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,339
of 241,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.