↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
373 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
738 Mendeley
Title
Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003331.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rod S Taylor, Viral A Sagar, Edward J Davies, Simon Briscoe, Andrew JS Coats, Hasnain Dalal, Fiona Lough, Karen Rees, Sally J Singh, Ify R Mordi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 738 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 720 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 16%
Student > Bachelor 107 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 13%
Researcher 84 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 7%
Other 147 20%
Unknown 131 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 279 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 111 15%
Sports and Recreations 42 6%
Psychology 35 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 3%
Other 86 12%
Unknown 162 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#905,807
of 18,110,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,298
of 11,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,094
of 198,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,110,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.