↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise‐based rehabilitation for heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
24 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
446 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
875 Mendeley
Title
Exercise‐based rehabilitation for heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003331.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rod S Taylor, Viral A Sagar, Edward J Davies, Simon Briscoe, Andrew JS Coats, Hasnain Dalal, Fiona Lough, Karen Rees, Sally J Singh, Ify R Mordi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 875 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 858 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 14%
Student > Bachelor 121 14%
Researcher 94 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 7%
Other 174 20%
Unknown 206 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 302 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 124 14%
Sports and Recreations 47 5%
Psychology 36 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 3%
Other 98 11%
Unknown 243 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#893,498
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,749
of 12,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,405
of 235,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.