↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
400 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
346 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Anglemyer, Hacsi T Horvath, Lisa Bero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 400 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 378 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 18%
Student > Master 62 16%
Researcher 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Other 26 7%
Other 86 22%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 164 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 11%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 72 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 313. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#65,922
of 19,199,228 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 11,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#646
of 199,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,199,228 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.