↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
419 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Anglemyer, Hacsi T Horvath, Lisa Bero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 445 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 428 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 17%
Student > Master 66 15%
Researcher 60 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 7%
Other 98 22%
Unknown 67 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 177 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 10%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Other 80 18%
Unknown 88 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 408. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#60,549
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 12,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#447
of 228,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.