↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009667.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hon Shing Ong, Jennifer R Evans, Bruce DS Allan

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 46 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Engineering 6 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,872,167
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,659
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,388
of 227,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.