↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
Title
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007325.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tasanee Braithwaite, Afshan A Nanji, Kristina Lindsley, Paul B Greenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 348 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 14%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Other 26 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 108 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 117 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,900,491
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,066
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,676
of 242,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.