↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
Title
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007325.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tasanee Braithwaite, Afshan A Nanji, Kristina Lindsley, Paul B Greenberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 282 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Other 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 67 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 74 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,445,347
of 20,828,611 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,444
of 12,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,143
of 204,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,828,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.