↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
Title
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007325.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tasanee Braithwaite, Afshan A Nanji, Kristina Lindsley, Paul B Greenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 343 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 15%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Other 26 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 106 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 115 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,616,411
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,689
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,444
of 227,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.