↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
76 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003968.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo, Amanda C de C Williams, Amy Lewandowski Holley, Stephen Morley, Emma Fisher, Emily Law

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 311 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 18%
Researcher 50 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 61 19%
Unknown 55 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 12%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 72 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#634,587
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,218
of 12,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,988
of 231,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.