↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003968.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo, Amanda C de C Williams, Amy Lewandowski Holley, Stephen Morley, Emma Fisher, Emily Law

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 294 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 19%
Researcher 49 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 45 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 27%
Psychology 81 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 13%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 62 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#523,012
of 21,955,070 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,039
of 12,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,244
of 205,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,955,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.