↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009103.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate E Lager, Amit K Mistri, Kamlesh Khunti, Victoria J Haunton, Aung K Sett, Andrew D Wilson

Abstract

People with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk of future stroke and other cardiovascular events. Evidence-based strategies for secondary stroke prevention have been established. However, the implementation of prevention strategies could be improved.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 287 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Unspecified 21 7%
Other 78 27%
Unknown 37 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 18%
Unspecified 21 7%
Psychology 17 6%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 49 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#12,781,062
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,773
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,698
of 227,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.