↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Botulinum toxin for upper oesophageal sphincter dysfunction in neurological swallowing disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Botulinum toxin for upper oesophageal sphincter dysfunction in neurological swallowing disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009968.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Regan, Anne Murphy, Mindy Chiang, Barry P McMahon, Tara Coughlan, Margaret Walshe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 58 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Psychology 14 6%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 64 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,230,436
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,529
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,716
of 189,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.