| Title |
Botulinum toxin for upper oesophageal sphincter dysfunction in neurological swallowing disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009968.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Regan, Anne Murphy, Mindy Chiang, Barry P McMahon, Tara Coughlan, Margaret Walshe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 279 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 21% |
| Unknown | 102 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 109 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,195,754
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,388
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,418
of 227,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#200
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.