| Title |
Heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients (excluding stroke and myocardial infarction)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003747.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raza Alikhan, Rachel Forster, Alexander T Cohen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Spain | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 351 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 12% |
| Researcher | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 70 | 20% |
| Unknown | 90 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 151 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Unknown | 104 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,834,006
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,903
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,968
of 242,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.