| Title |
Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011674.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrícia Parreira, Martijn W Heymans, Maurits W van Tulder, Rosmin Esmail, Bart W Koes, Nolwenn Poquet, Chung‐Wei Christine Lin, Christopher G Maher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 13% |
| Brazil | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 66% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 588 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 586 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 89 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 13% |
| Researcher | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 121 | 21% |
| Unknown | 186 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 110 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Psychology | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 67 | 11% |
| Unknown | 211 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,090,662
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,193
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,710
of 331,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.