Report for: Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

Title	Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd009931.pub2
Pubmed ID	24801519
Authors	Edward T Gilbert-Kawai, Kay Mitchell, Daniel Martin, John Carlisle, Michael PW Grocott
Abstract	Permissive hypoxaemia describes a concept in which a lower level of arterial oxygenation (PaO2) than usual is accepted to avoid the detrimental effects of high fractional inspired oxygen and invasive mechanical ventilation. Currently however, no specific threshold is known that defines permissive hypoxaemia, and its use in adults remains formally untested. The importance of this systematic review is thus to determine whether any substantial evidence is available to support the notion that permissive hypoxaemia may improve clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	2	22%
Germany	1	11%
United States	1	11%
Kuwait	1	11%
Unknown	4	44%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	5	56%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	2	22%
Scientists	1	11%
Unknown	1	11%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
South Africa	1	<1%
Unknown	178	99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	26	15%
Student > Ph. D. Student	18	10%
Student > Bachelor	16	9%
Researcher	11	6%
Professor > Associate Professor	10	6%
Other	42	23%
Unknown	56	31%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	74	41%
Nursing and Health Professions	18	10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	5	3%
Neuroscience	4	2%
Psychology	4	2%
Other	15	8%
Unknown	59	33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.

All research outputs

#2,044,022

of 22,755,127 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#4,434

of 12,314 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#21,868

of 227,501 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#89

of 228 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context