↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009931.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward T Gilbert-Kawai, Kay Mitchell, Daniel Martin, John Carlisle, Michael PW Grocott

Abstract

Permissive hypoxaemia describes a concept in which a lower level of arterial oxygenation (PaO2) than usual is accepted to avoid the detrimental effects of high fractional inspired oxygen and invasive mechanical ventilation. Currently however, no specific threshold is known that defines permissive hypoxaemia, and its use in adults remains formally untested. The importance of this systematic review is thus to determine whether any substantial evidence is available to support the notion that permissive hypoxaemia may improve clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 178 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 11 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 59 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,044,022
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,434
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,868
of 227,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.