↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006134.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Grimes, LaShawn B. Jones, Laureen M Lopez, Kenneth F Schulz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Other 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 78 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 81 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,092,876
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,076
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,267
of 243,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.