↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐invasive ventilation during exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Non‐invasive ventilation during exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Collette Menadue, Amanda J Piper, Alex J van 't Hul, Keith K Wong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 269 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 19%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Other 20 7%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 78 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 89 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,785,496
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,873
of 12,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,363
of 235,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.