↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-invasive ventilation during exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive ventilation during exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Collette Menadue, Amanda J Piper, Alex J van 't Hul, Keith K Wong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 233 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 18 8%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 61 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 72 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,565,177
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,584
of 12,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,593
of 228,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.