↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Zinc supplementation for preventing mortality, morbidity, and growth failure in children aged 6 months to 12 years of age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
531 Mendeley
Title
Zinc supplementation for preventing mortality, morbidity, and growth failure in children aged 6 months to 12 years of age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009384.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan Mayo-Wilson, Jean A Junior, Aamer Imdad, Sohni Dean, Xin Hui S Chan, Evelyn S Chan, Aneil Jaswal, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 522 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 19%
Researcher 80 15%
Student > Bachelor 63 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 10%
Student > Postgraduate 35 7%
Other 91 17%
Unknown 107 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 180 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 8%
Social Sciences 29 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 67 13%
Unknown 124 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#455,417
of 18,951,205 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#967
of 11,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,180
of 199,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,951,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.