↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
Title
Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003948.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Una J Adderley, Ian GS Holt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 321 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Other 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 79 25%
Unknown 84 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 20%
Unspecified 19 6%
Psychology 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 90 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,677,791
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,385
of 12,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,501
of 239,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.