↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003948.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Una J Adderley, Ian GS Holt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 21 8%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 66 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 20%
Psychology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 72 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,133,702
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,808
of 12,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,096
of 228,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.