↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003948.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Una J Adderley, Ian GS Holt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 21%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Other 18 8%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 51 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 22%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 56 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,186,244
of 18,203,597 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,849
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,254
of 198,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,203,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.