↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Control methods forAedes albopictusandAedes aegypti

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Control methods forAedes albopictusandAedes aegypti
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012759
Authors

Praveen Weeratunga, Chaturaka Rodrigo, Sumadhya Deepika Fernando, Senaka Rajapakse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 21%
Student > Master 20 20%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 25 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,773,609
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,300
of 12,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,803
of 318,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.