The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004272.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenna Morgan, Lynda Wyld, Karen A Collins, Malcolm W Reed |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 83 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 84 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,771,359
of 26,492,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,291
of 13,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,211
of 242,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,492,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.