↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004272.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna Morgan, Lynda Wyld, Karen A Collins, Malcolm W Reed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 41 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 42 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,445,041
of 17,641,103 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,641
of 11,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,773
of 196,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,641,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.