↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Thrombophilia testing for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Thrombophilia testing for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007069.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danny M Cohn, Fleur Vansenne, Corianne A de Borgie, Saskia Middeldorp

Abstract

Tests for thrombophilia are being performed on a large scale in people after venous thromboembolism (VTE) even though the benefits of testing are still subject to debate. The most important benefit would be a reduction in the risk of recurrent VTE due to the use of additional prophylactic measures. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,328,806
of 21,312,573 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,855
of 12,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,127
of 205,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,312,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.