| Title |
Oral substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004145.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Gowing, Michael F Farrell, Reinhard Bornemann, Lynn E Sullivan, Robert Ali |
| Abstract |
Injecting drug users are vulnerable to infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and other blood borne viruses as a result of collective use of injecting equipment as well as sexual behaviour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 53 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Psychology | 23 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,726,738
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,261
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,515
of 131,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.