| Title |
Horticultural therapy for schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009413.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Liu, Bo Li, Stephanie J Sampson, Samantha Roberts, Guoyou Zhang, Weiping Wu |
| Abstract |
Horticultural therapy is defined as the process of utilising fruits, vegetables, flowers and plants facilitated by a trained therapist or healthcare provider, to achieve specific treatment goals or to simply improve a person's well-being. It can be used for therapy or rehabilitation programs for cognitive, physical, social, emotional, and recreational benefits, thus improving the person's body, mind and spirit. Between 5% to 15% of people with schizophrenia continue to experience symptoms in spite of medication, and may also develop undesirable adverse effects, horticultural therapy may be of value for these people. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 333 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 104 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 18% |
| Psychology | 47 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 13% |
| Unknown | 112 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,254,596
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,757
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,543
of 241,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.