↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010252.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luit Penninga, André Wettergren, Colin H Wilson, An-Wen Chan, Daniel A Steinbrüchel, Christian Gluud

Abstract

Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for end-stage liver failure. To date, no consensus has been reached on the use of immunosuppressive T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction of immunosuppression after liver transplantation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 19%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 55 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,427
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,290
of 226,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#213
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.