↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating persistent pain in survivors of torture

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating persistent pain in survivors of torture
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012051.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Baird, Amanda C de C Williams, Leslie Hearn, Kirstine Amris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 452 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 17%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 160 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 12%
Psychology 44 10%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 184 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,567,715
of 26,014,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,070
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,956
of 331,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,014,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.