↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Triptans for acute cluster headache

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Triptans for acute cluster headache
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008042.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Law, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 4, 2010 (Law 2010). Cluster headache is an uncommon,severely painful, and disabling condition, with rapid onset. Validated treatment options are limited; first-line therapy includes inhaled oxygen. Other therapies such as intranasal lignocaine and ergotamine are not as commonly used and are less well studied. Triptans are successfully used to treat migraine attacks and they may also be useful for cluster headache.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 32 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,062,976
of 17,455,239 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,764
of 11,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,477
of 197,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,455,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.